Saturday, August 05, 2006

Your Daughters Will Beg You for ....MODEST SWIM WEAR

So there IS a market for legalism. I haven't been able to get through the entire catalog of "modest swim wear" without breaking out into helpless laughter, but here is a link to the site, sure to generate chuckles in the sane among us:

Modest Swim Wear

And if those don't work, You could always try ordering these

10 Comments:

At 11:28 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I hate to tell you this; but when I was growing up in an IFBx church, those suits would have been an improvement over either having to wait for specified swim times or not getting to go at all.

These days, if I want a modest suit, I'd go for Ohana swimwear, even if it is a Mormon company.

-Call me "the escapee"

 
At 11:45 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well Ohana is not nearly as comical as "Modest Swimwear," but the consumer is really just buying a cut-down surfing wet suit. I can't see any significant difference between a body hugging wet suit from Ohana and an ordinary one-piece bathing suit. So I would just go to LL Bean. In fact, that's where I purchase my swimsuits.

 
At 4:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Unbelievable. Obviously these were created by a man and not by a woman. I know from experience that any time you wear something on top of a bathing suit, the moment you climb out of the pool it gets vacuum packed to your body. Just don't go if you are that paranoid!Of course, I noticed there are NO men's suits listed.

 
At 6:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Katherine: Well, yeah, men don't have to be modest. Women don't get turned on by what they see, so men can wear what they want. In fact, women are not supposed to get turned on at all...

*snork* Riiiiiiiight. And people wonder why I left certain churches?

-The escapee

 
At 3:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

That's not what Katherine said at all.

 
At 6:15 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think it is scary how close "Christian" fundamentailsm is to Islamic fundamentalism. A lot of misgyny in both camps.

 
At 9:01 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous: I was answering Katherine, not quoting her. FTR, I was also agreeing with her that there is a problem when there are no modesty requirements for men.

I also think Katherine got what I said because of her response. Right on, ma'am! :)

-The escapee

 
At 11:45 AM, Blogger spiffin said...

Ah, merely a case of proper colon usuage. Not serious as long as we are still on the plain of punctuation!

 
At 12:56 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I once saw a site that sold modest swimwear for both sexes. The men had board shorts and mesh T-shirts, while the women had--I don't exactly remember; I think it was a kind of full-coverage skirted suit with sleeves. If it weren't almost midnight here, I would Google it.

Double standard aside, though, I would buy one of the suits on the site you featured if I planned to spend any time swimming outdoors, because it looks like it might actually protect a person from the twin evils of Alaskan lakes: hypothermia and leeches in places you can't see.

Jenny Islander

 
At 7:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I know this post is old but OMG!!! LMAO!

Thanks for the comical reminder of why I ran and never looked back! LOL

Poor girls, the only thing that separates that aesthetically challenged monstrosity from a Muslim girls Burqini is about 12 inches of fabric and a hood.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home